What's the reasoning behind using ld64 for gccXX?

[vincent habchi]

On 19 avr. 2012, at 22:07, Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo.med.uc.edu> wrote:

> On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 09:47:13PM +0200, vincent habchi wrote:
>> Folks,
>> 
>> What about the upcoming LLD?
>> 
>> Vincent
>  If lld is the proposed replacement for the existing ld linker tool, what is proposed as the replacement assmebler for compilers outside of clang?

llvm-mc?

Vincent