reduce fails to build on 10.6

Mark Brethen mark.brethen at gmail.com
Fri Jan 6 18:07:37 PST 2012


On Jan 6, 2012, at 6:12 PM, Daniel J. Luke wrote:

> On Jan 6, 2012, at 7:07 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>> We've already had a lengthy discussion about subports, variants, or everything in one port. subports would be a fine way to go, if it was desired to have separately installable ports. It sounded like Mark didn't think that would be of advantage, and because of #16373 it would be of disadvantage because the source, which is around 370MB, would have to be checked out from the project's repository twice.
> 
> 
> ... which could be worked around by just making a tarball of the source that should be built (which is preferred over fetching the source via cvs/svn/git/whatever anyway) 
> 
> --
> Daniel J. Luke                                                                   
> +========================================================+                        
> | *---------------- dluke at geeklair.net ----------------* |                          
> | *-------------- http://www.geeklair.net -------------* |                          
> +========================================================+                        
> |   Opinions expressed are mine and do not necessarily   |                          
> |          reflect the opinions of my employer.          |                          
> +========================================================+
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> macports-dev mailing list
> macports-dev at lists.macosforge.org
> http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev

I don't follow you; are you saying to tarball after fetching from svn? What do you do with it then?


Mark






More information about the macports-dev mailing list