gcc-4.2 vs apple-gcc-4.2

[Jeremy Huddleston]

On Jan 17, 2012, at 3:46 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:

> 
> On Jan 17, 2012, at 17:43, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
> 
>> That looks good to me, but I would very much like to know what ports fall into this category, so I can check if this is still the case with top-of-tree clang and file a bug against the compiler if necessary.
>> 
>> I know wine falls into this category, but most "normal" ports should be fine with clang (or llvm-gcc if clang doesn't work for some reason, but again please file compiler bugs or poke me to do so).
>> 
>> Also, as clang gets fixed for these issues in future XCodes, we should change that ${configure.compiler} == "clang" to ${configure.compiler} == "clang" && [vercmp $xcodeversion Fixed.Version] < 0
>> 
>> --Jeremy
> 
> It's just so tedious. I don't have time to file all these bug reports and keep track of what versions of clang work. I'm happy if we can commit a fix, any fix, that lets a port compile.

If you don't have time to report bugs, they won't get fixed.  That's why I said you should tell me about it if you don't want to file the bug report, so I can do it for you.