RFC new actions

[Rainer Müller]

On 01/30/2012 04:19 PM, Andrea D'Amore wrote:
> Please someone have a check at [1] for actions 'active' and
> 'inactive', actually just shorthands for 'echo active' and 'echo
> inactive'
> I don't think there are any cons but I'm asking before committing.

The commands 'port installed' and 'port outdated' have a real benefit as 
they list additional information. But in this case, this is just an 
alias for the existing echo with a pseudo-port.

Do we really want to have a command for every pseudo-port name? In that 
case, more than just active and inactive are missing at the moment.

Rainer