rev-upgrade to determine if binary is distributable

[Bradley Giesbrecht]

On Jun 6, 2012, at 3:50 PM, Jeremy Lavergne wrote:

>> Would it make sense that while rev-upgrade was testing links it could collect licenses and make a determination if a port is distributable?
>> 
>> Example: djvulibre is not distributable do to an rdep on ImageMagick though I fail to see where anything djvulibre installs is linked to anything ImageMagick installs.
> 
> I'd modify the distributable script to do that (server-oriented) rather than rev-upgrade (client-oriented).

Yep. Rev-upgrade triggered the idea get port licenses based on linked files rather then port deps. The distributable script is a better place to perform the test.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2763 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/macports-dev/attachments/20120606/45e216c0/attachment.bin>