dports at macports.org
Wed Jun 27 02:39:42 PDT 2012
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 04:04:35AM -0500, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> You would need to increase the port's revision so that it gets rebuilt following this change.
No, the port previously failed to build.
> However, the problem with this change is that it makes all the subports conflict with one another.
Yes. This port primarily installs a command-line tool and it is (in
this case) more useful to have that installed with a reasonable name
than to support multiple installations. It would probably be better
named file-rename or something.
Dan R. K. Ports MIT CSAIL http://drkp.net/
More information about the macports-dev