[91179] trunk/dports/sysutils/yum/Portfile

Eric Cronin ecronin at macports.org
Mon Mar 26 05:35:02 PDT 2012


On Mar 25, 2012, at 11:39 PM, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
> 
> On Mar 25, 2012, at 11:16 PM, Eric Cronin wrote:
> 
>> 
>>>>> and a path-based depends_lib like before is appropriate
>>>> 
>>>> A path:-based depends_lib would be ok. a lib:-based depends_lib is not ok because that would allow a non-MacPorts librpm installed in a system directory to satisfy the dependency, and we don't want that.
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> Again you are reacting to a non-existent fact:
>>> 	There is no librpm.dylib being installed.
>> 
>> 
>> The various flavors that I quickly checked before sending the first e-mail all installed unversioned symlinks:
>> 
> 
> So do you want unversioned symlinks or duplicated ports removed?
> 
> The effort involved in this discussion already likely
> exceeds the interest and usage case for rpm in MacPorts.


I have no opinion about many conflicting rpm ports vs just the latest rpm port vs nobody providing something that lets you just do "-lrpm" vs going all the way and adding "port select rpm".  The easiest solution would seem to be what I suggested the first time, just mark all the rpm ports as conflicting with one another...  I don't use yum or rpm (on mac), I just happened to spot something in the diff that caught my curiosity and confirmed that the ports as they stand have undocumented conflicts.

Thanks,
Eric


More information about the macports-dev mailing list