[91179] trunk/dports/sysutils/yum/Portfile
Eric Cronin
ecronin at macports.org
Mon Mar 26 05:35:02 PDT 2012
On Mar 25, 2012, at 11:39 PM, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
>
> On Mar 25, 2012, at 11:16 PM, Eric Cronin wrote:
>
>>
>>>>> and a path-based depends_lib like before is appropriate
>>>>
>>>> A path:-based depends_lib would be ok. a lib:-based depends_lib is not ok because that would allow a non-MacPorts librpm installed in a system directory to satisfy the dependency, and we don't want that.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Again you are reacting to a non-existent fact:
>>> There is no librpm.dylib being installed.
>>
>>
>> The various flavors that I quickly checked before sending the first e-mail all installed unversioned symlinks:
>>
>
> So do you want unversioned symlinks or duplicated ports removed?
>
> The effort involved in this discussion already likely
> exceeds the interest and usage case for rpm in MacPorts.
I have no opinion about many conflicting rpm ports vs just the latest rpm port vs nobody providing something that lets you just do "-lrpm" vs going all the way and adding "port select rpm". The easiest solution would seem to be what I suggested the first time, just mark all the rpm ports as conflicting with one another... I don't use yum or rpm (on mac), I just happened to spot something in the diff that caught my curiosity and confirmed that the ports as they stand have undocumented conflicts.
Thanks,
Eric
More information about the macports-dev
mailing list