Subversion 1.7 and 1.8

[Jim Jagielski]

I'll take it on, at least until git-svn no longer requires 1.7... Sound OK?


On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 10:01 AM, Daniel J. Luke <dluke at geeklair.net> wrote:

> On Aug 2, 2013, at 9:40 AM, Jim Jagielski <jimjag at gmail.com> wrote:
> > I'm thinking it makes sense to break out the subversion port to svn17
> and svn18, since git-svn only appears to work reliably with subversion 1.7.
>
> might be easier to just help upstream fix git-svn?
>
> > As it is now, git-core +svn "forces" the use of svn 1.8.
> >
> > Comments?
>
> only that I'm not interested in maintaining an older version of subversion
> - but if someone else wants to I'm not opposed to it.
>
> --
> Daniel J. Luke
> +========================================================+
> | *---------------- dluke at geeklair.net ----------------* |
> | *-------------- http://www.geeklair.net -------------* |
> +========================================================+
> |   Opinions expressed are mine and do not necessarily   |
> |          reflect the opinions of my employer.          |
> +========================================================+
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/macports-dev/attachments/20130802/ea68f61f/attachment.html>