RFC: Support for future compilers in base

Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia jeremyhu at macports.org
Fri Feb 15 12:42:22 PST 2013

On Feb 15, 2013, at 12:18 PM, Sean Farley <sean at macports.org> wrote:

> Rainer Müller writes:
>> On 2013-02-15 09:10, Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia wrote:
>>> I'd like to update base trunk such that future versions of clang, dragonegg, and gcc "just work", so we don't need to wait for newer versions of base to depend on newer compilers.
>>> I've taken a first pass at portconfigure.tcl and here is a patch.  Comments?  Concerns?
>> Fine with me.
>> This change makes sense as the features supported by the gcc and clang
>> compilers shipped in ports are almost homogenous at the moment; in the
>> past there were differences as not all gcc4* shipped gfortran or gcj.
>> However, I don't expect the situation to change in the near future.
> Clang doesn't provide fortran but all gcc ports do. How is that almost
> homogenous?

Did you actually look at the patch?  It doesn't treat clang the same as it does gcc.  It treats all gcc versions the same as all other gcc versions; it treats all clang versions the same as all other clang versions; and it treats all dragonegg versions the same as it treats all other dragonegg versions...

> That's a huge difference when building mpi-dependent ports.

Which is not really affected by this…

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4145 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/macports-dev/attachments/20130215/c5502e76/attachment.p7s>

More information about the macports-dev mailing list