Where to include port version in 'port pkg' output?

[Joshua Root]

On 2013-1-5 10:15 , Blair Zajac wrote:
> I got some feedback from the Munki people [1] and it honors any number
> of integers in a version number, so to ensure that packages and
> metapackages will support epoch without issue, I put in the epoch number
> into the generated filenames and internal version number.

Hm, I don't think it's always desired to have the epoch in the filename,
e.g. for base releases. Maybe the epoch and revision could be left out
when they are 0?

- Josh