Switching to Perl 5.16
Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia
jeremyhu at apple.com
Mon Jul 1 10:58:49 PDT 2013
On Jul 1, 2013, at 10:33 AM, Joshua Root <jmr at macports.org> wrote:
> On 2013-7-2 02:30 , Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia wrote:
>>
>> On Jul 1, 2013, at 3:44 AM, Joshua Root <jmr at macports.org> wrote:
>>
>>>>> Anything that depends on intltool and uses the standard autoconf macros
>>>>> to check for it also needs to be updated when intltool is,
>>>>> unfortunately. INTLTOOL_PERL needs to match the perl used by intltool,
>>>>> or the configure script complains.
>>>>
>>>> I tried setting +perl5_16 as a variant in my full rebuild this weekend, and intltool was certainly the biggest thorn..
>>>>
>>>> Is there any reason not to just do something like this:
>>>>
>>>> ...
>>>
>>> There's no guarantee that perl5 is linked to the same perl version as
>>> p5-xml-parser's dependency uses.
>>
>>
>> Oh, we want to support changing perl variants on the fly then…
>>
>> So then is this the correct approach we should be taking:
>>
>> Index: Portfile
>> ===================================================================
>> --- Portfile (revision 107485)
>> +++ Portfile (working copy)
>> @@ -2,9 +2,11 @@
>> # $Id$
>>
>> PortSystem 1.0
>> +PortGroup perl5 1.0
>>
>> name intltool
>> version 0.50.2
>> +revision 1
>> maintainers nomaintainer
>> categories textproc gnome
>> license GPL-2+
>> @@ -31,13 +33,13 @@
>>
>> depends_build port:gnome-common
>> depends_lib port:expat \
>> - port:perl5.12 \
>> - port:p5.12-xml-parser \
>> - port:p5.12-getopt-long \
>> - port:p5.12-pathtools \
>> - port:p5.12-scalar-list-utils
>> + port:perl5 \
>> + port:p${perl5.major}-xml-parser \
>> + port:p${perl5.major}-getopt-long \
>> + port:p${perl5.major}-pathtools \
>> + port:p${perl5.major}-scalar-list-utils
>>
>> -configure.perl ${prefix}/bin/perl5.12
>> +configure.perl ${prefix}/bin/perl${perl5.major}
> Still doesn't work. perl5.major isn't guaranteed to be the same at build
> time and activation time. (And what do dependents use for INTLTOOL_PERL?)
So then do we really need variants for each perl version in each dependent application? Should we add logic to the perl5 port group that used perl5_Y variants for this stuff? I don't want to see that mess land in Portfiles like it has for python.
> The problem isn't really with intltool itself, it's that the autoconf
> macro isn't smart enough to figure out which perl intltool is using on
> its own. (Or possibly that it even cares about such a thing; shouldn't
> the presence of a working intltool be enough without also checking for
> an implementation detail such as XML::Parser?)
I agree with that statement, but I also think we need a solution to the general problem of "hey I need perl with these modules, and I don't care what version of perl it is"
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4136 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/macports-dev/attachments/20130701/dae35901/attachment.p7s>
More information about the macports-dev
mailing list