[105866] trunk/dports/python/py-graph-tool/Portfile
Mark Moll
mmoll at rice.edu
Wed May 8 15:01:27 PDT 2013
On May 8, 2013, at 2:12 PM, Ryan Schmidt <ryandesign at macports.org> wrote:
>
> On May 8, 2013, at 12:47, mmoll at macports.org wrote:
>
>> Revision: 105866
>> https://trac.macports.org/changeset/105866
>> Author: mmoll at macports.org
>> Date: 2013-05-08 10:47:21 -0700 (Wed, 08 May 2013)
>> Log Message:
>> -----------
>> py-graph-tool: update to version 2.2.24
>>
>> Modified Paths:
>> --------------
>> trunk/dports/python/py-graph-tool/Portfile
>>
>> Modified: trunk/dports/python/py-graph-tool/Portfile
>> ===================================================================
>> --- trunk/dports/python/py-graph-tool/Portfile 2013-05-08 17:39:06 UTC (rev 105865)
>> +++ trunk/dports/python/py-graph-tool/Portfile 2013-05-08 17:47:21 UTC (rev 105866)
>> @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
>>
>> set realname graph-tool
>> name py-${realname}
>> -version 2.2.23
>> +version 2.2.24
>> categories python science
>> platforms darwin
>> license GPL-3
>> @@ -20,9 +20,9 @@
>> homepage http://graph-tool.skewed.de
>> master_sites http://downloads.skewed.de/graph-tool/
>> use_bzip2 yes
>> -checksums md5 d4d7da6a906f458baf3b2c01e86b76e2 \
>> - sha1 3924f10ae7507392f9b5fc38e18b299e4f2fcb9d \
>> - rmd160 ffd845d9da3c8708804c60a6d0c7f5732980be1b
>> +checksums md5 1c1ec9e8df33fe1d1560736b98816743 \
>> + sha1 0ba18967a749396c8a959e423cb6c9532add4432 \
>> + rmd160 cc1979e17e4604b163bc2a620c4c76b9c4ff58d6
>> distname ${realname}-${version}
>> python.versions 26 27 31 32
>> python.default_version 27
>> @@ -40,6 +40,8 @@
>> port:py${python.version}-gobject3 \
>> port:py${python.version}-cairo
>> use_configure yes
>> + # parallel build starts swapping, even on a MacBook Pro with 8GB of RAM.
>> + use_parallel_build no
>
> Is this because of clang, which tends to use more RAM than other compilers? If so, you could leave parallel building on when configure.compiler does not match "*clang*".
Could be. It uses very heavily-templated code, so I wouldn’t be surprised if it was a problem for gccXX as well. I don’t have an easy way to test it, since I think I’d have to recompile boost with gccXX as well.
--
Mark Moll
More information about the macports-dev
mailing list