Ticket #39378

[Peter Danecek]

Thanks for this hint!
Probably it is best, to be more explicit in the subject.
~petr


On Nov 14, 2013, at 18:10 , Mojca Miklavec <mojca.miklavec.lists at gmail.com> wrote:

> PS: I would suggest to include the port name in the subject, but then
> again I'm not sure about the balance between the number of committers
> which would only take a look if they noticed from the subject that
> they are interested in the port (and would ignore the request
> otherwise) and those which would ignore the request after seeing a
> port they are not interested in, but would take the time to check the
> ticket if the subject didn't name a port, and maybe decide to commit
> nevertheless. In any case, mentioning that you have written a patch
> always helps, even if the patch needs some minor modifications.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 1762 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/macports-dev/attachments/20131114/a01319f0/attachment.p7s>