On Nov 24, 2013, at 19:00, pixilla at macports.org wrote:
> Revision
> 113879
> Author
> pixilla at macports.org
> Date
> 2013-11-24 17:00:09 -0800 (Sun, 24 Nov 2013)
> Log Message
>
> mail/dovecot2:
> - Update to version 2.2.9.
> mail/dovecot2-antispam:
> - Revbump.
> mail/dovecot2-sieve:
> - Update to version-changeset 0.4.2-1821.
> --- trunk/dports/mail/dovecot2-sieve/Portfile 2013-11-24 23:52:50 UTC (rev 113878)
> +++ trunk/dports/mail/dovecot2-sieve/Portfile 2013-11-25 01:00:09 UTC (rev 113879)
>
> @@ -8,7 +8,8 @@
>
>
>
> # set hg.tag to tag or rev.
>
> hg.tag ${version}
>
> -#hg.tag 1820
>
> +#
> +hg.tag 1821
>
>
>
> # Maintainers: Please revbump port:dovecot2-sieve and port:dovecot2-antispam
>
> # on port:dovecot2 version changes.
>
> @@ -48,8 +49,8 @@
>
>
>
> worksrcdir dovecot-[join [split ${dovecot2} .] -]-pigeonhole-${hg.tag}
>
>
>
> -checksums rmd160 b96f9cbb050cf2ab825bfa1c33dc804f969e447b \
> - sha256 5f944da51ecc49b4fe0c3b938cb6fd28723ce31c59a40087df31b9c147eb4571
>
> +checksums rmd160 f6daacf0aea4e678ec70bf76b9c9c8780e9b3984 \
> + sha256 475edb79912c8c1154c028e6250b9c408a8cc4184b8aff55d5504f572c8e0815
>
>
This didn’t change the port version, revision or epoch, so the user will not be prompted to upgrade this port; if this change is important for existing users, you should increase the revision. This is also suggested by comments in the portfile:
# Maintainers: Please revbump port:dovecot2-sieve and port:dovecot2-antispam
# on port:dovecot2 version changes.
# Maintainers: Please revbump port:dovecot2-sieve when hg.tag changes or reset to 0 on version
# changes.