libpgf Portfile

[René JV Bertin]

Yes, that would correspond to my experience.

On 25 Dec 2014, at 15:35, Lawrence Velázquez <larryv at macports.org> wrote:

> On Dec 25, 2014, at 3:58 AM, René J.V. Bertin <rjvbertin at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> On Thursday December 25 2014 00:51:33 Mihai Moldovan wrote:
>> 
>>> Actually, it is. Without running portindex first, the port will not be
>>> recognized as outdated.
>> 
>> That's not my experience. I've routinely bumped version and revision numbers in my local portfiles, without running portindex.
> 
> The "outdated" pseudoport (as in `port upgrade outdated`) will not include newly-updated ports if the portindex has not been refreshed with `portindex` or something that calls it, like `port selfupdate` or `port sync`.
> 
> However, updating a port and upgrading it explicitly (e.g., `port upgrade foo`) works.
> 
> vq