revision bump?

Blair Zajac blair at orcaware.com
Thu Feb 20 11:07:02 PST 2014


On Feb 20, 2014, at 10:53 AM, Frank Schima <macsforever2000 at macports.org> wrote:

> 
> On Feb 20, 2014, at 11:36 AM, Peter Danecek <Peter.Danecek at bo.ingv.it> wrote:
> 
>> Is it necessary to revision bump a port to force the build of a binary archive?
>> 
>> I am fixing one of my ports. It was possible to install the port in some cases, in other it failed, depending on the personal setup. For the details here the ticket: http://trac.macports.org/ticket/42576. However, the installed files of this port should not have changed. This would mean not revision bump. 
>> 
>> But is it then guarantied that the binary archive is build?
> 
> Any Portfile change will attempt a rebuild of the archive on the buildbot, a revision increase would not be appropriate here. I have implemented your fix in r117253 [1]. 

Just to be clear, my understanding is that a buildbot will only attempt a rebuild of a port if there is no binary archive for it when the Portfile changes (with no rev bump).  If there’s a binary archive, then it won’t attempt a rebuild.  Is this correct?

Blair



More information about the macports-dev mailing list