buildbot and binary archives ...

[Joshua Root]

On 2014-2-21 12:17 , Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> 
> On Feb 20, 2014, at 09:44, Peter Danecek wrote:
> 
>> On 20 Feb 2014, at 16:00, Jeremy Lavergne wrote:
>>
>>> packages.macports.org/PACKAGENAME/
>>
>> So looking up `http://packages.macports.org/py-obspy/` reveals that a binary archives were produces some time ago. These are marked "noarch", which is probably wrong. There are compiled extensions. I do not understand where this comes from, this was not changes in the Portfile. I suspected it might have been set by the Port Group, but if I read the code right, it is set only for the py-* port not the version specific subports.
> 
> And looking at the list of binary packages provided, *only* the py-* stub port is available. The actual compiled extensions are not being made available as binaries; there are many reasons why that might be the case. Also, the newest version shown there is 0.8.4; the port is currently at 0.9.0.

To be clear, each port has its own directory, so:
<http://packages.macports.org/py27-obspy/>
<http://packages.macports.org/py26-obspy/>

As you can see, the py26 version is there, but not the py27 because of
the incorrectly named license you pointed out.

- Josh