new ports and maintainer

Daniel J. Luke dluke at
Fri Jul 25 07:55:04 PDT 2014

On Jul 25, 2014, at 10:31 AM, Mihai Moldovan <ionic at> wrote:
> * On 25.07.2014 03:50 pm, Daniel J. Luke wrote:
>> +1 for this too. I have at least one non-openmaintainer port that went ~9 years between upstream releases - I'm not going to remember to check in a mostly meaningless timestamp update every 6 months just to keep it non-openmaintainer.
> It is busywork.  However, I find it very unlikely that a port doesn't get
> changed at least once every 6 months. Maybe not for updates, but because
> dependencies require a revision bump, a new OS version came out requiring a
> quick fix, or just because base evolved.

this is something we could mine our subversion repo to see if it's true or not (or how true it is).

Daniel J. Luke                                                                   
| *---------------- dluke at ----------------* |                          
| *-------------- -------------* |                          
|   Opinions expressed are mine and do not necessarily   |                          
|          reflect the opinions of my employer.          |                          

More information about the macports-dev mailing list