new ports and maintainer

[Daniel J. Luke]

On Jul 25, 2014, at 10:31 AM, Mihai Moldovan <ionic at ionic.de> wrote:
> 
> * On 25.07.2014 03:50 pm, Daniel J. Luke wrote:
>> +1 for this too. I have at least one non-openmaintainer port that went ~9 years between upstream releases - I'm not going to remember to check in a mostly meaningless timestamp update every 6 months just to keep it non-openmaintainer.
> 
> It is busywork.  However, I find it very unlikely that a port doesn't get
> changed at least once every 6 months. Maybe not for updates, but because
> dependencies require a revision bump, a new OS version came out requiring a
> quick fix, or just because base evolved.

this is something we could mine our subversion repo to see if it's true or not (or how true it is).

--
Daniel J. Luke                                                                   
+========================================================+                        
| *---------------- dluke at geeklair.net ----------------* |                          
| *-------------- http://www.geeklair.net -------------* |                          
+========================================================+                        
|   Opinions expressed are mine and do not necessarily   |                          
|          reflect the opinions of my employer.          |                          
+========================================================+