[119727] trunk/dports/math/OpenBLAS-devel/Portfile

[Nicolas Pavillon]

Hello, 

Thanks for the tip, I corrected it in r119753. Thankfully the hashes I encountered up to now were below the date-type 
version, so that I could even avoid increasing the epoch. 

Cheers, 

Nicolas

On May5, 2014, at 13:55, Ryan Schmidt <ryandesign at macports.org> wrote:

> 
> On May 4, 2014, at 21:27, nicos at macports.org wrote:
> 
>> Revision
>> 119727
>> Author
>> nicos at macports.org
>> Date
>> 2014-05-04 19:27:10 -0700 (Sun, 04 May 2014)
>> Log Message
>> 
>> OpenBLAS-devel: update to latest commit
>> Modified Paths
>> 
>> 	• trunk/dports/math/OpenBLAS-devel/Portfile
>> Diff
>> 
>> Modified: trunk/dports/math/OpenBLAS-devel/Portfile (119726 => 119727)
>> 
>> --- trunk/dports/math/OpenBLAS-devel/Portfile	2014-05-05 02:26:17 UTC (rev 119726)
>> +++ trunk/dports/math/OpenBLAS-devel/Portfile	2014-05-05 02:27:10 UTC (rev 119727)
>> @@ -5,7 +5,8 @@
>> PortGroup           github 1.0
>> PortGroup           muniversal 1.0
>> 
>> -github.setup        xianyi OpenBLAS 1140c489c902
>> +github.setup        xianyi OpenBLAS 020f36f97091
>> +revision            1
> 
> MacPorts users who had the previous version of this port installed will not be informed of this update via “port outdated” (or “sudo port upgrade outdated”) because:
> 
> $ ~/macports/users/ryandesign/scripts/vercmp 1140c489c902 020f36f97091
> MacPorts considers 1140c489c902 to be greater than 020f36f97091.
> 
> Increasing the revision has no effect on this. Only increasing the epoch will fix this. And recall that the epoch can never be removed from a port nor decreased.
> 
> You should pick a version number that in normal updates only increases. A commit hash from a distributed version control system like git is thus not a good choice for the version field. Instead, if the project does not assign version numbers, consider inventing a version number in the YYYYMMDD format.
>