svn conflict

[Craig Treleaven]

At 10:59 AM -0500 10/18/14, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>On Oct 18, 2014, at 8:22 AM, Craig Treleaven wrote:
>>  At 12:45 PM +0200 10/18/14, Peter Danecek wrote:
>>>  On 18 Oct 2014, at 02:55, Craig Treleaven wrote:
>>>
>>>>  I've ended up with an svn conflict--just in the capitalization 
>>>>of the directory name, if I'm reading this right.
>>>>
>>>>  SixBare:mp-trunk-ports craigtreleaven$ svn status
>>>>  ?       sysutils/MacPorts_daemondo
>>>>  !     C sysutils/macports_daemondo
>>>>       >   local add, incoming add upon update
>>>
>>>  Might this be, because the underlaying FS is not case-sensitive 
>>>(only case-preserving) so the two names would identify basically 
>>>the same directory?
>>>
>>>  Have you used `svn mv` to capitalise the name? Or how did you get 
>>>into the current state?
>>
>>  I don't know how it got out of sync.  I thought I committed it 
>>with uppercase in the directory name.  Anyway, I just changed the 
>>local directory name to lowercase, did 'svn update' and the 
>>conflict is gone.
>
>You probably had the directory "MacPorts_daemondo" on disk, but ran 
>"svn add macports_daemondo" which scheduled it for addition in the 
>all-lowercase version. Subversion is always case-sensitive, even on 
>case-insensitive-but-case-preserving filesystems.
>
>>  I can live with the lowercase directory name.
>
>Note:
>
>$ port lint MacPorts_daemondo
>--->  Verifying Portfile for MacPorts_daemondo
>Warning: Line 2 is missing RCS tag ($Id$)
>Error: Portfile directory macports_daemondo does not match port name 
>MacPorts_daemondo
>--->  1 errors and 1 warnings found.

I'm an svn newbie, where/how does the RCS tag get set?  I thought it 
was something that was automatically added by svn.

Should I now do 'svn move sysutils/macports_daemondo 
sysutils/MacPorts-daemondo' ?  Don't want to screw this up more...

Craig