doc and doc-new in svn

[Joshua Root]

On 2015-4-9 00:30 , Eitan Adler wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> In this post it says that the old "doc" tree will be reviewed and
> removed "soon".  In 2008.
> https://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/macports-dev/2008-June/005432.html
> 
> Is there any reason to keep the old doc tree around?

The reviewing part, to check if there's any information in doc that is
missing from doc-new, still needs to be done.

- Josh