standard way to require c++11?

[Mihai Moldovan]

On 30.04.2015 03:56 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> On Apr 29, 2015, at 1:37 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>> That was going to be my suggestion, to avoid a proliferation of portgroups that all do something similar.
> 
> For example, right now I'm dealing with the fact that gpsd 3.14 requires C11 (not C++11), and would like to be able to indicate that so that pre-C11 compilers get blacklisted.

Hmm, a valid request. But what is an appropriate name for such a PortGroup?
"standards"?

And what should the default value be? C++11? C11?



Mihai

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 884 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/macports-dev/attachments/20150430/f2478a44/attachment.sig>