dragonegg?

[René J.V. Bertin]

On Friday January 09 2015 10:33:56 Lawrence Velázquez wrote:

> > Unless I'm mistaken and it's the other way round, dragonegg is a gcc
> > front-end to llvm.> 
> It's a GCC plugin that swaps out the backend.

Isn't that another or equivalent way of saying the same (or equivalent) thing?

> To provide a port? Not complicated. To provide working software that doesn't have upstream backing? Different story.

Was I wrong presuming that MacPorts only provides ports that are not known to be dysfunctional? ^^

R.