libc++, C++11, and C++14 on Leopard and Snow Leopard
Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia
jeremyhu at macports.org
Thu Jan 15 11:43:12 PST 2015
> On Jan 15, 2015, at 10:25, Mojca Miklavec <mojca at macports.org> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 9:39 AM, Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia wrote:
>>
>> This brings a modern toolchain back to OS X Leopard, so users still on that old OS can have C++11 and C++14 support and install ports that require it.
>
> Just a somewhat related question: what is the status of (any) compiler
> support for Leopard on PPC?
I'm spending a little bit of my spare time on it, but someone with more time and more stake should step up as my spare time is a bit limited ;0
> I tried to install the latest gcc, but I didn't manage to build libgcc
> http://trac.macports.org/ticket/46557
> To my big surprize clang-3.4 installed (after approximately 24 hours)
> without any issues, but then I was bitten by an error when trying to
> compile something, most probably by this:
> https://trac.macports.org/ticket/39052
> with a "wontfix" status.
It's not really "wontfix" so much as "upstream to fix" ... but along that line, clang-3.6 should be a bit better (and clang-3.5 could probably work with a few cherry picks from trunk). Unfortunately, getting to the point of installing clang-3.6 is non-trivial on Leopard/ppc.
Also, I need to fix how compiler-rt builds libclang_rt.osx.a in our clang ports when using SL and older SDKs to include a ppc slice. As it is now, we can compile just fine, but we don't have the runtime bits for ppc, so linking an executable fails.
> So I'm still stuck with gcc-4.2-only at the moment.
Yes.
> I'm not asking for libc++ on PPC. I know that this might require quite
> a bit of effort, but I would like to know if *any* slightly more
> modern compiler could be built and used.
Yesterday, I was pointed to:
http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/sw/llvm/
https://github.com/fangism/libcxxabi/tree/powerpc-darwin8
https://github.com/fangism/libcxx/tree/powerpc-darwin8
> --------
>
> PowerPC aside (or included :), it would be really nice to have a few
> extra buildbots for 10.6-10.8 (or maybe even 10.5 now that you got it
> working) with libc++ being set by default to allow compiling C++11
> code.
I wouldn't say libc++ is *working* for 10.5. I got it building, and am using a clang built on top of it to build a bunch of ports, but that's not a thorough testing and verification of C++11.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4145 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/macports-dev/attachments/20150115/5c1cd75f/attachment.p7s>
More information about the macports-dev
mailing list