[138297] trunk/dports/math/octave-control/Portfile

Ryan Schmidt ryandesign at macports.org
Sun Jul 5 00:01:36 PDT 2015


On Jul 5, 2015, at 12:12 AM, Mihai Moldovan wrote:

> On 05.07.2015 05:48 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>> Could you be more specific about why a revbump of octave-control was needed? I understand a revbump of octave was needed following the updates to the gcc48 and gcc49 ports, but how does that translate into requiring octave-control to be revbumped?
> 
> [17:40:49] < mschamschula> Ionic: If I revbump octave and then uninstall the old
> gcc version octave-control will not be the wiser, as it was linked against the
> old library

octave doesn't contain any static libraries, so we're talking about a dynamic library... wouldn't octave-control then simply use the newer octave dynamic library when octave is updated?




More information about the macports-dev mailing list