Could a port have a dependency on a port variant?

[Joël Brogniart]

> Le 25 juin 2015 à 20:40, Lawrence Velázquez <larryv at macports.org> a écrit :
> 
> On Jun 25, 2015, at 1:44 PM, Clemens Lang <cal at macports.org> wrote:
> 
>> ----- On 25 Jun, 2015, at 12:19, Joël Brogniart Joel.Brogniart at laposte.net wrote:
>> 
>>> For example, the port for auto-multiple-choice has a variant -latex as this
>>> software is able to work either with MacPorts TexLive installation or the
>>> official OS X TexLive installation. Users of TexLive generally prefer to use
>>> the official version as it contains many valuable tools.
>> 
>> Which tools are that, and does MacPorts' copy of TeXLive not have them? For
>> example, I prefer the MacPorts version over the installer.
> 
> Ditto. I expect Dan would like to know if his packaging is missing anything.
> 
> vq

Oops, I'm sorry I said something stupid. I counfounded TextLive and MacTeX. TexLive on MacPorts is complete. But users arround me often install the MacTex package that add GUI applications to the TexLive.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 841 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <https://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/macports-dev/attachments/20150626/2510ab00/attachment.sig>