port upgrade outdated order

[Lawrence Velázquez]

On Mar 3, 2015, at 6:50 PM, René J.V. Bertin <rjvbertin at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Tuesday March 03 2015 17:01:08 Daniel J. Luke wrote:
> 
>>> Is there a way to influence the order in which (sub)ports are upgraded?
>> 
>> upgrade works in dependency order
> 
> And for when the dependencies are identical?

As far as I know, independent branches of a dependency tree are not intentionally processed in any particular order.

>> note that trace mode fixes this ;-)
> 
> How so?

By masking files that aren't part of the operating system, Xcode, or port dependencies.

vq