[141139] trunk/base/src/port1.0/portchecksum.tcl
Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia
jeremyhu at macports.org
Mon Nov 2 23:43:48 PST 2015
Well since nobody else spoke, this is what I went with in r142074.
Thanks,
Jeremy
> On Oct 12, 2015, at 07:00, Daniel J. Luke <dluke at geeklair.net> wrote:
>
> I can’t speak for anyone else, but that works for me :)
>
>> On Oct 11, 2015, at 8:08 PM, Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia <jeremyhu at macports.org> wrote:
>>
>> Ok, so if the set includes the union of "good" and "specified", we're all happy?
>>
>>> On Oct 11, 2015, at 13:25, Daniel J. Luke <dluke at geeklair.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> If we really want to encourage people to stop using the weak hashes, we could print a warning if any of them are in the output.
>>>
>>>> On Oct 11, 2015, at 4:12 PM, Joshua Root <jmr at macports.org> wrote:
>>>> How about this:
>>>>
>>>> * If the checksums specified in the Portfile include sha256, just print
>>>> out the actual values for those checksum types.
>>>>
>>>> * If not, add sha256 to the list when printing out the actual values.
>>>>
>>>> After all there's no harm in using weak hashes in addition to good ones.
>>>>
>>>> - Josh
>>>>
>>>> On 2015-10-12 07:02 , Joshua Root wrote:
>>>>> Yes, and I seem to remember having this conversation once before... :)
>>>>>
>>>>> On 2015-10-12 05:06 , Daniel J. Luke wrote:
>>>>>> it’s really useful for the case when upstream publishes a checksum (that’s not one of our default ‘good’ ones) when the output includes the checksums that are in the portfile.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Oct 11, 2015, at 1:34 PM, jeremyhu at macports.org wrote:
>>>>>>> Use $default_checksum_types for handy copy/paste output on checksum failure
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This should help adoption of better, more robust hashing algorithms.
>
> —
> Daniel J. Luke
> +========================================================+
> | *---------------- dluke at geeklair.net ----------------* |
> | *-------------- http://www.geeklair.net -------------* |
> +========================================================+
> | Opinions expressed are mine and do not necessarily |
> | reflect the opinions of my employer. |
> +========================================================+
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> macports-dev mailing list
> macports-dev at lists.macosforge.org
> https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
More information about the macports-dev
mailing list