[150207] trunk/dports/perl/p5-net-cidr-lite/Portfile

[mf2k at macports.org]

Hi Dave,


> On Jul 12, 2016, at 11:49 PM, devans at macports.org wrote:
> 
> Revision
> 150207 <https://trac.macports.org/changeset/150207>Author
> devans at macports.org <mailto:devans at macports.org>Date
> 2016-07-12 22:49:03 -0700 (Tue, 12 Jul 2016)
> Log Message
> 
> p5-net-cidr-lite: license.
> Modified Paths
> 
> trunk/dports/perl/p5-net-cidr-lite/Portfile <x-msg://75/#trunkdportsperlp5netcidrlitePortfile>
> Diff
> 
>  <>Modified: trunk/dports/perl/p5-net-cidr-lite/Portfile (150206 => 150207)
> 
> --- trunk/dports/perl/p5-net-cidr-lite/Portfile	2016-07-13 05:47:45 UTC (rev 150206)
> +++ trunk/dports/perl/p5-net-cidr-lite/Portfile	2016-07-13 05:49:03 UTC (rev 150207)
> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
>  perl5.branches      5.22 5.24
>  perl5.setup         Net-CIDR-Lite 0.21
>  revision            2
> +license             {Artistic-1 GPL}
Thank you for updating all of these perl ports! I noticed that we are putting only “GPL” in license field. But really our guidance is to determine the GPL version because it affects if we can distribute a binary. So I did some digging and it appears that Perl allows GPL version 1 or greater [1]. So maybe we should instead be using the following as the default perl license. Or does simply stating “GPL” cover that already and that is why it has always been that way?

license             {Artistic-1 GPL-1+}

[1] <http://dev.perl.org/licenses/>


Cheers!
Frank

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/macports-dev/attachments/20160713/f17ab0d8/attachment.html>