[149308] trunk/dports/science/paraview/Portfile

[David Strubbe]

Hi Ryan,

The +testing variant of revision 2 is equivalent to no variant at revision
1. So, yes it does have an effect, of removing quite a lot of installed
files that are unnecessary except for when testing.

David

On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 3:21 AM, Ryan Schmidt <ryandesign at macports.org>
wrote:

>
> > On Jun 10, 2016, at 12:31 PM, dstrubbe at macports.org wrote:
> >
> > Revision
> > 149308
> > Author
> > dstrubbe at macports.org
> > Date
> > 2016-06-10 10:31:56 -0700 (Fri, 10 Jun 2016)
> > Log Message
> >
> > paraview: Previous commit (because of +testing) should have increased
> revision.
>
> > --- trunk/dports/science/paraview/Portfile    2016-06-10 15:00:52 UTC
> (rev 149307)
> > +++ trunk/dports/science/paraview/Portfile    2016-06-10 17:31:56 UTC
> (rev 149308)
> > @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
> >
> >  name                paraview
> >  version             5.0.1
> > -revision            1
> > +revision            2
>
> Since the +testing variant added by the previous commit was not a default
> variant, forcing users to rebuild will do nothing; the revision should not
> have been increased (but don't change it back now).
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/macports-dev/attachments/20160611/8a1ae331/attachment.html>