querying the registry for reverse dependencies
René J.V. Bertin
rjvbertin at gmail.com
Tue Nov 1 11:52:18 PDT 2016
On Tuesday November 01 2016 13:33:26 Brandon Allbery wrote:
Hi,
In hindsight it indeed seems unlikely that the registry would contain this kind of information.
>I think that's a hack: save and nuke the port in question (manually), then
>let rev-upgrade catch the broken dependents for you.
Exactly, though nuking evokes something a bit less precise than what this actually does :)
R.
More information about the macports-dev
mailing list