querying the registry for reverse dependencies

René J.V. Bertin rjvbertin at gmail.com
Tue Nov 1 11:52:18 PDT 2016


On Tuesday November 01 2016 13:33:26 Brandon Allbery wrote:

Hi,

In hindsight it indeed seems unlikely that the registry would contain this kind of information.

>I think that's a hack: save and nuke the port in question (manually), then
>let rev-upgrade catch the broken dependents for you.

Exactly, though nuking evokes something a bit less precise than what this actually does :)

R.


More information about the macports-dev mailing list