Issues with oudated ports / GitHub

[Christopher Jones]

> On 7 Oct 2016, at 8:08 pm, Lawrence Velázquez <larryv at macports.org> wrote:
> 
>> On Oct 7, 2016, at 2:58 PM, Christopher Jones <jonesc at hep.phy.cam.ac.uk> wrote:
>> 
>>> On 7 Oct 2016, at 7:40 pm, Lawrence Velázquez <larryv at macports.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> On Oct 7, 2016, at 2:09 PM, Chris Jones <jonesc at hep.phy.cam.ac.uk> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Currently, once they find out about svn, and trac
>>> 
>>> We will still use Trac for issue tracking, although I believe someone is
>>> looking into integrating GitHub sign in.
>> 
>> Personally I think we have to migrate away from trac as well. Pull
>> requests in GitHub will largely replace what happens in trac for
>> submission of patches and the discussion of them. If we stick with
>> trac for issues then for me it will be an utter mess.
> 
> We will not be migrating to GitHub Issues in its current form. Several
> of us (not me) have already evaluated it as a possible Trac replacement
> and concluded that it is insufficient for our needs.

OK… I predict a lot discussion will naturally start to happen associated with the pull requests, as that will be the most natural place to discuss them, so I think this decision will need to be re-assessed at some ...

Chris

> 
> vq

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/macports-dev/attachments/20161007/931fdca2/attachment.html>