Compiling dnsmasq with dnssec support?

[Johannes Kastl]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi Joshua,

On 30.10.16 12:19 Joshua Root wrote:
> On 2016-10-30 19:15 , Johannes Kastl wrote:
>> Question 1: Is it possible to use different
>> patchfiles-statements, depending on the variant?
> 
> Yes.

As the documentation (at least the pages I found) does not have an
example of this, do you know of any port that uses this?

>> Question 2: Is it possible to add another patch in one
>> variant?
> 
> Yes.

see above.

>> Question 3: Is there any reason why no +dnssec variant exists?
>> Or why dnssec is not enabled by default (as long as the dnssec
>> stuff is commented in the dnsmasq.conf it should not interfere,
>> I guess)?
> 
> Probably just nobody asked for it before now.

That was my first guess.

Johannes
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: Using GnuPG with SeaMonkey - http://www.enigmail.net/

iEYEARECAAYFAlgWFFoACgkQzi3gQ/xETbIvvwCeNYjoEpfjwZ6Mn2+/GZG8t72s
PwwAn1ZzdE1rFqHFU5n4SaUNJ63LL9fv
=RnpW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----