[152743] trunk/dports/_resources/port1.0/group

[Rainer Müller]

On 2016-09-16 17:33, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> 
>> On Sep 16, 2016, at 9:06 AM, Rainer Müller <raimue at macports.org> wrote:
>>
>> I would keep this as Mac OS X 10.5 Leopard, the name does not change
>> retroactively.
> 
> I suppose that's an open question. Previously, I've tried to use the OS marketing name as it was when that OS version was released. Now, I'm thinking we should always use the current marketing name. Do we have any guidance from Apple on what they want people to do?
> 
>> The version number is usually also helpful to get the
>> "10.X" to "darwin Y" mapping right.
> 
> Yes but I didn't want to go into a long explanation in that comment.

Then let's just replace it here with "(e.g. 16 for macOS 10.12 Sierra)"
to avoid the confusion.

>>> options minimum_xcodeversions
>>> @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@
>>>                     return -code error "unable to find Xcode"
>>>                 }
>>>                 if {[vercmp ${xcodeversion} ${minimum_xcodeversion}] < 0} {
>>> -                    ui_error "On Mac OS X ${macosx_version}, ${name} ${version} requires Xcode ${minimum_xcodeversion} or later but you have Xcode ${xcodeversion}."
>>> +                    ui_error "On macOS ${macosx_version}, ${name} @${version} requires Xcode ${minimum_xcodeversion} or later but you have Xcode ${xcodeversion}."
>>
>> Why drop the foo @1.0 syntax that we use at so many other places to
>> specify a port version?
> 
> I didn't drop it; I started using it, finally, in this portgroup.

Sorry, somehow I misread that in reverse... I blame Friday :-)

Rainer