port -v checksum

[John Patrick]

Cheers Josh and Ryan, that exactly covered what I was after.

I added sah512 incorrectly assuming it was supported, and so being
used. Will look into this behaviour more tonight and raise a ticket
with what I find regarding it.

John

On 7 February 2017 at 08:07, Joshua Root <jmr at macports.org> wrote:
> On 2017-2-7 08:11 , John Patrick wrote:
>>
>> should 'port -v checksum' check all checksum's listed?
>>
>> just wondering as about to upgrade a port version and it complained
>> about the rmd160, I updated rmd160 with the new checksum but not the
>> sha512
>>
>> if their an option to force it to check all checksum's listed to I
>> know the Portfile is valid for the new version?
>
>
> 'port checksum' should definitely always check all the checksums listed in
> the Portfile and fail if any of them don't match those of the distfile. It
> will additionally compute rmd160 and sha256 if those are not listed when it
> fails, so you can easily add them.
>
> As Ryan mentioned, sha512 is not currently supported. If port doesn't
> complain when you use it, it probably should.
>
> If this doesn't address your questions, please describe in more detail
> exactly what you did, what happened, and what you think should have happened
> instead.
>
> - Josh