question for the "base gurus"

Wed Jan 25 00:14:28 UTC 2017

On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 6:53 PM, René J.V. Bertin <rjvbertin at gmail.com>
wrote:

> 0775 (00000001:11111101) turning into 0255 (0000000:10101101), there's no
> logical explanation (involving umask()) for that, is there?

That is what you'd get if the *umask* were 0255.

-- 
brandon s allbery kf8nh                               sine nomine associates
allbery.b at gmail.com                                  ballbery at sinenomine.net
unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad        http://sinenomine.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.macports.org/pipermail/macports-dev/attachments/20170124/3e7fad75/attachment-0001.html>