[macports-ports] branch master updated: util-linux: add snowleopardfixes

[Ken Cunningham]

This ticket this fix came from predated the snowleopard_fixes portgroup.

You're quite correct - since the portgroup was committed, that would be the
proper fix now. -- K

On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 5:59 PM, Ryan Schmidt <ryandesign at macports.org>
wrote:

>
> On Oct 19, 2017, at 08:57, Kurt Hindenburg wrote:
>
> > Kurt Hindenburg (kurthindenburg) pushed a commit to branch master
> > in repository macports-ports.
> >
> >
> > https://github.com/macports/macports-ports/commit/
> 7e06fb25e9464ce95d9474b0095c21069bd6d07f
> >
> > The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push:
> >
> >      new 7e06fb2  util-linux: add snowleopardfixes
> >
> > 7e06fb2 is described below
> >
> >
> > commit 7e06fb25e9464ce95d9474b0095c21069bd6d07f
> >
> > Author: Kurt Hindenburg <khindenburg at macports.org>
> > AuthorDate: Thu Oct 19 09:56:15 2017 -0400
> >
> >
> >     util-linux: add snowleopardfixes
> >
> >
> >
> >     closes https://trac.macports.org/ticket/54410
>
>
> > @@ -59,6 +59,11 @@ configure.args      --disable-agetty \
> >  # When adding new programs, check the .c file for license
> >  build.target        colcrt column look rename rev scriptreplay setsid
> >
> > +platform darwin 10 {
> > +    depends_lib-append          port:snowleopardfixes
> > +    configure.ldflags-append   -lsnowleopardfixes
> > +}
>
> Why only apply this on Snow Leopard? Aren't earlier systems affected too?
>
> Why not just include the portgroup which handles the details for you?
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.macports.org/pipermail/macports-dev/attachments/20171110/31245b1a/attachment-0001.html>