Consequences of using MacPorts GCC as a fallback compiler on PowerPC

[Ryan Schmidt]

On Mar 23, 2018, at 14:42, Kenneth F. Cunningham wrote:

> On 2018-03-23, at 12:02 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
>> 
>> I still like the convention of marking ports as "requires C++11" much
>> more than "please blacklist gcc 3.0 and gcc 4.2".
> 
> It's elegant, but also opens endless issues about C11 or C14 or C17 or c++17 and brings much confusion, IMHO.

Specifying in a port what C or C++ language standard is used shouldn't bring confusion; it should resolve it.