GSOC

[Abhishek Kashyap]

On 26 March 2018 at 14:03, Mojca Miklavec <mojca at macports.org> wrote:

> (Resending the email since I initially posted from the wrong email address)
>
> Dear Abhishek,
>
> On 26 March 2018 at 08:00, Abhishek Kashyap wrote:
> > Yes,I can totally ageee with you.But i focus more attention towards the
> goal
> > of the project almost from GSOC period.I am not doing for money instead i
> > want to be part of open source. This will be my achivements.So please
> view
> > my proposals and suggest changes.Even i not able to contact my mentor.So
> > that i can maximise the chance of accepting into GSOC.
> > Thank You
>
> I did send you some feedback for which you have deliberately chosen to
> argue against instead of doing it.
>
>
And you did receive a very detailed reply from precisely one of two
> people listed as a potential mentor. Do you want to say you did not
> receive it?
> No,till now there is no reply from mentors.
> I have nothing to add to that, except that Ignoring the advice we gave
> you in numerous email (including the plea to not send emails to
> individual people, but keep discussion on the list, ignoring feedback
> you receive etc.) will do anything but increase your chances to get
> accepted.
>
> Mojca
>
> On 25 March 2018 at 23:38, Rainer Müller wrote:
> > Hello Abhishek,
> >
> > On 2018-03-25 16:43, Abhishek Kashyap wrote:
> >> I have drafted my proposals through GSOC portal.Please review it,give
> >> feedback and suggest changes.As time is very less (only 2 days left) So
> >> i hope you plase take steps soon as possible.
> >
> > Your proposal is well-structured and follows our template. However, you
> > should be more careful with the English language and especially
> punctuation.
> >
> > Let me go through the proposal and leave comments:
> >
> > Project Idea & Abstract
> >
> > The project idea section does not actually explain the project idea.
> >
> > You cannot say that you want "To make MacPorts efficient ,useful and
> > popular". This would imply it is none of this at the moment. Also, how
> > does your project help to reach that?
> >
> > In the abstract, the output of 'port selfupdate' is not relevant to your
> > proposal. Why are you not even showing the message for unread items that
> > would appear there? Why are you not demonstrating how 'port news' will
> work?
>

I have updated these

>
>



> > The goal needs to be made clear here. It is definitely not "to inform
> > user about exact configuration changes that has been made after updating
> > the port tree". Your goal is a mechanism to deliver announcements to
> > users of MacPorts. These announcements are distributed along with the
> > ports tree and can be read by users with a 'port news' command.
>
>



> I have written as directed by you.
> Now i am writing methodology.Guide me to do this and see the changes i
> made.
>
Thank You
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.macports.org/pipermail/macports-dev/attachments/20180326/7f7bdbb7/attachment.html>