ctreleaven at cogeco.ca
Sun Apr 4 01:35:21 UTC 2021
> On Apr 3, 2021, at 8:21 PM, Wowfunhappy at gmail.com <wowfunhappy at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On 2021-1-27 02:57 , Andrew Janke wrote:
>>> I didn't know that! I must be behind the times with the state of MacPorts. Thanks for the update.
>> About a decade behind -- the buildbot went live in 2011. ;)
>> - Josh
> I see this misconception all over the place, that Homebrew is fast because it uses prebuilt binaries, whereas MacPorts makes you wait while software is compiled. It can't just be due to outdated information, if we're more than a decade out from when the buildbot went live.
> I know it's just one data point, but I thought the replies I got on this Hacker News comment today were interesting. I can understand why he/she got confused, and I wonder if there's anything MacPorts could do to make it clearer. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26678498 <https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26678498>
It happens that I just did a self update and upgraded 20 ports on 10.15. 6 or the 20 were built from source. I believe this is higher than usual due to the backlog on the 10.15 builbot. Even in the best case, however, a fair number of ports will be built from source for the well-known reasons. It would be interesting to know, say, how many of our most-requested ports are always built from source.
Eg, git is our second-most requested port and it is always built from source AFAIK.
Almost any reasonably complex package will have some of its dependencies that must be built from source.
To the average user, I would suggest that we should emphasize that MacPorts installs binaries whenever allowed by licensing but makes a serious effort to avoid contravening the various open source licenses. Plus MacPorts offers many more options (“variants”) to customize installations and offers a wide breadth of packages.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the macports-dev