changing 'configure' options for testing

[Jason Liu]

In addition to the code Ken just provided, he and others have helped me
with some test-related "protection" code, so that in addition to a
+tests variant, there is the following section of code (I usually place it
after any build-related sections, and before any destroot-related sections,
in order to keep my portfiles laid out in the same order as the port
phases):

pre-test {
    if {![variant_isset tests]} {
        ui_error "'tests' variant must be activated to enable test support"
        error "Please enable the 'tests' variant and try again"
    }
}

-- 
Jason Liu


On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 11:13 AM Ken Cunningham <
ken.cunningham.webuse at gmail.com> wrote:

>
> On 2021-09-28 7:44 a.m., Daniel J. Luke wrote:
> > On Sep 20, 2021, at 10:20 AM, Daniel J. Luke <dluke at geeklair.net> wrote:
> >> On Sep 20, 2021, at 8:15 AM, Frank Dean <frank at fdsd.co.uk> wrote:
> >>> Daniel J. Luke <dluke at geeklair.net> writes:
> >>>> The newest version of clamav uses cmake for builds. In the
> 'configure' stage, I have it disabling tests because otherwise it won't
> build without the test dependencies installed (check and pytest).
> >>>>
> >>>> Do we have a template or example of a canonical way to handle this? I
> don't see an obvious hook for when someone is running `port test` to change
> configure.args (I could, of course, add a post-extract/pre-configure and do
> some non-declaritive test to see if `port test` is being run and use that
> to branch - but that feels like a bad design choice).
> >>> The rapidjson port implements a 'tests' variant to handle a similar
> >>> situation.  I used the same pattern for the libosmium port.  The tests
> >>> can then be run with `sudo port -d test current +tests`.
> >> That works, I guess.
> >>
> >> Is there interest in having base auto-add +tests if `port test` is
> called? (I haven't looked at base/ code in a while, but it seems possible).
> I like to imagine a future where we have enough infrastructure that we
> would run `port test` for any ports that have test.run set.
> > On this same train of thought - clamav tests run against the installed
> libraries (like some other ports tend to do) - in long-ago times I'd solve
> this by setting DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH - but since SIP started removing these
> that no longer works normally. I think trace mode has a(n elaborate)
> workaround where it copies binaries and executes the copies, but that
> doesn't seem like something I should implement in a portfile ;-) [This is
> another instance where if trace mode were the default, things would 'just
> work']
> >
> > Has anyone else already solved this?
>
>
> The way our cmake PortGroup sets things up, running tests is harder. You
> can configure cmake to allow testing to find the libraries in the build
> tree. See for example what I did in libcbor:
>
>
> variant tests description {enable tests} {
>      depends_test-append         port:cmocka
>      configure.args-append       -DWITH_TESTS=ON
>      configure.pre_args-replace -DCMAKE_BUILD_WITH_INSTALL_RPATH:BOOL=ON \
> -DCMAKE_BUILD_WITH_INSTALL_RPATH:BOOL=OFF
>      test.run            yes
>      test.target         test
> }
>
> Ken
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.macports.org/pipermail/macports-dev/attachments/20210928/2ca6f275/attachment.htm>