license_noconflict ignored on builders?
jasonliu at umich.edu
Sat Jan 15 00:37:34 UTC 2022
Yes, I went back and re-read that before I posted. The second example might
qualify as having answered my question, but since "openssl" is both the
name of a port and one of the licenses, maybe that's not the best example
to be using? Especially considering that the keyword just above
"license_noconflict" is "license", and the second example in that entry
uses "freetype", which again is both the name of a port and one of the
On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 7:23 PM Ryan Schmidt <ryandesign at macports.org>
> On Jan 14, 2022, at 18:14, Jason Liu wrote:
> > Oh, was license_noconflict supposed to be used with the name of a port?
> I thought it was supposed to specify a license that didn't conflict!
> See the documentation for license_noconflict at
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the macports-dev