+universal for x864+arm64 on Macintel

Christopher Jones jonesc at hep.phy.cam.ac.uk
Wed Jun 15 16:10:01 UTC 2022

> On 15 Jun 2022, at 3:25 pm, René J.V. Bertin <rjvbertin at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Base is exactly smart enough. When supported_archs contains only 1 arch, it does make sense to offer a universal variant, therefore base prevents it.
> As I said before, supported_archs contains x86_64 and arm64.

what about configure.universal_archs though, have you set that to have > 1 entry ? thats what base cares about, hence the "due to < 2 supported universal_archs

> If ports should be able to create a universal variant in case that variant isn't created automatically, "base" should be polite enough to assume that the port maintainers know and have a reason for what they're doing.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 1930 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.macports.org/pipermail/macports-dev/attachments/20220615/32c77d6a/attachment.bin>

More information about the macports-dev mailing list