Updating openjdk8 to 8u392

[Sergey Fedorov]

Kirill, when you will have time for this, please also check if we can build
this as X11-only for old systems, where native ObjC libs fail to build.
I fixed the build on PPC up to AWT libs, but those are hopeless, or I got
no idea what to do to fix them anyway.
If we get rid of those, perhaps we can have openjdk8 at least back to 10.5,
including PPC.

On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 1:18 AM Kirill A. Korinsky via macports-dev <
macports-dev at lists.macports.org> wrote:

> I technically can do it, but not early than November.
>
> :(
>
> --
> wbr, Kirill
>
> On 22. Oct 2023, at 17:39, Nils Breunese <nils at breun.nl> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> The openjdk8 port in MacPorts is currently at 8u372, but two updates with
> security fixes have been released since then: 8u382 in July and 8u392 this
> month. I don’t maintain the openjdk8 port myself, but I’ve tried bumping
> the version, because this port is specified as the java.fallback depedency
> for a number of ports, but sadly without success. I think the patches that
> MacPorts tries to apply are no longer valid, but I don’t have an Intel
> machine and I don’t know how to make the ARM patch work.
>
> I’ve created Trac issues for updating openjdk8 in which I’ve documented
> the errors I got, but the oldest has already been open for over 3 months:
>
> * 8u382: https://trac.macports.org/ticket/67804
> * 8u392: https://trac.macports.org/ticket/68498
>
> Can anyone update openjdk8 to 8u392?
>
> I have updated the openjdk8-zulu and openjdk-corretto ports, which
> installed pre-built binaries from Azul and Amazon respectively, but it
> would be nice if our main built-from-source openjdk8 port was also
> up-to-date with all security fixes.
>
> Nils.
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.macports.org/pipermail/macports-dev/attachments/20231023/041d9a46/attachment-0001.htm>