gcc compilers to be supported by Macports, especially on older MacOS systems
Chris Jones
jonesc at hep.phy.cam.ac.uk
Thu Nov 21 14:56:13 UTC 2024
On 21/11/2024 2:49 pm, Ken Cunningham wrote:
>
>
>> On Nov 21, 2024, at 6:44 AM, Chris Jones <jonesc at hep.phy.cam.ac.uk> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 21/11/2024 2:44 pm, Ken Cunningham wrote:
>>>> On Nov 21, 2024, at 1:29 AM, Chris Jones via macports-dev <macports-dev at lists.macports.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> OOTH: If gcc10 is available and installed, why would you want to call in a full build of gcc13 unnecessarily to build the port?
>>>>
>>>> If you are suggesting the builds should check to see what the user has installed and pick a compiler based on that, then no, absolutely not.
>>> Nobody ever suggested that.
>>
>> Then what precisely are you posing to do ?
>>
>
> Exactly what was stated before:
>
> current status then is we have a proposal to restrict available compilers on systems < 10.6 to
>
> gcc48, gcc5, gcc6, gcc7, gcc10, and gcc14
OK, The proposals where hard to follow as you keep switching between
making changes for all OSes and only for < 10.6..
It also does not explain how you would achieve your statement
"OOTH: If gcc10 is available and installed, why would you want to call
in a full build of gcc13 unnecessarily to build the port?"
If you allow me to now rewrite this as
"OOTH: If gcc10 is available and installed, why would you want to call
in a full build of gcc14 unnecessarily to build the port?"
then explain how you propose the compiler selection would work ? If a
user has gcc10 installed, but does not have gcc14, then if the gcc
selection remains as it is (use most recent available) a port build will
still pick gcc14 and install that before using it ? I cannot see how you
achieve the above without having the port first peak to see what the
user has installed and base its decisions on that.
More information about the macports-dev
mailing list