[MacPorts] #15937: port deactivate is a bit blood-thirsty (acts like it would delete /)
MacPorts
noreply at macports.org
Sun Jul 20 08:28:07 PDT 2008
#15937: port deactivate is a bit blood-thirsty (acts like it would delete /)
---------------------------------+------------------------------------------
Reporter: stephen at xemacs.org | Owner: macports-tickets at lists.macosforge.org
Type: defect | Status: closed
Priority: Normal | Milestone: MacPorts base bugs
Component: base | Version: 1.7.0
Resolution: wontfix | Keywords:
---------------------------------+------------------------------------------
Changes (by raimue at macports.org):
* status: new => closed
* resolution: => wontfix
Comment:
Replying to [comment:4 ryandesign at macports.org]:
> Actually I wouldn't even change that. A port might install a directory
in, say, /Applications/MacPorts. For example for minivmac 3 I want to make
a directory /Applications/MacPorts/Mini vMac. And lesstif installs a
directory in ${x11prefix}/LessTif. MacPorts should remove these
directories if these ports are uninstalled.
/Applications/MacPorts is in our mtree, ${x11prefix} is not. So lesstif
would not get uninstalled correctly if we would change that. Also there
would be no automatic cleanup if a port accidentally installs files
outside the mtree.
> So since I haven't heard of any detriment being caused by the code the
way it is, and changing it will cause problems as detailed above, I would
say we should close this as wontfix.
I agree. Closing as wontfix.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.macports.org/ticket/15937#comment:5>
MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/>
Ports system for Mac OS
More information about the macports-tickets
mailing list