[MacPorts] #14909: Roadmap does not provide direction
MacPorts
noreply at macports.org
Tue May 20 10:22:27 PDT 2008
#14909: Roadmap does not provide direction
----------------------------------+-----------------------------------------
Reporter: rhwood at macports.org | Owner: wsiegrist at apple.com
Type: defect | Status: assigned
Priority: High | Milestone:
Component: server/hosting | Version:
Resolution: | Keywords: milestones roadmap
----------------------------------+-----------------------------------------
Changes (by raimue at macports.org):
* cc: raimue at macports.org (added)
Comment:
I generally like the idea to make a better roadmap using milestones. I
wouldn't make "2.0" a milestone for "later", because there could be
tickets which need a great change and therefore are not to be considered
for 1.x releases. We should better make a separate milestone named like
"later", "unconsidered", "unscheduled", "open".
For tickets against ports we should use the 'Component' field set to
"ports" and not assign a milestone. For the difference between "Port
Bugs", "Port Enhancements", "Port Updates" etc. we could set the 'Type'
field accordingly (''defect'', ''enhancement'', ''update'',
''submission'', ''request'').
But this is not ideal as it could result in invalid combinations (like
Component "base" and Type "request"). So as an alternative – if we bother
about those invalid combinations at all – we could instead use the
'Keyword' field to reflect the state of the ticket by adding one of
''defect'', ''enhancement'', ''update'', ''submission'', ''request'' to
it.
We should create [http://trac.macports.org/report reports] as a
replacement for the currently used milestones to get a quick overview over
tickets for a specific component/type.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.macports.org/ticket/14909#comment:3>
MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/>
Ports system for Mac OS
More information about the macports-tickets
mailing list