[MacPorts] #18359: Guide has wrong advice about variants
MacPorts
noreply at macports.org
Thu Feb 5 09:26:43 PST 2009
#18359: Guide has wrong advice about variants
-------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
Reporter: ryandesign@… | Owner: markd@…
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: Normal | Milestone: Website & Documentation
Component: guide | Version: 1.7.0
Keywords: | Port:
-------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
Comment(by markd@…):
I think I did it that way because that is the way I was told to do it way
back. But it also seems to me that somewhere in the past I borked the
hourly portindex function on macports because of a variant I used in the
global section of a portfile. I think it was explained to me that
variants in the global section of portfiles are evaluated by the macports
box that does the portindex. So I thought that only certain keywords
could be used within a variant declaration. That is what I recall, by way
of explanation. If that is wrong or no longer true, then let's hash that
out and I'd be happy to modify the guide accordingly. I do agree that it
is clearer to put everything a variant does in the variant declarations
much of the time.
Also, realize that I recently started distinguishing in the guide between
"platform variants" and "user-selected variants" (see reference section).
If there is any truth to my recalled understanding above, perhaps it was
the platform variants that caused the problem. If so, then that would
change the user advice too; at the vary least it would mean only warning
about being careful with platform variants instead of variants in general.
So let me know if there is any truth at all to this and I'll be happy to
correct the guide accordingly.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.macports.org/ticket/18359#comment:2>
MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/>
Ports system for Mac OS
More information about the macports-tickets
mailing list