[MacPorts] #18173: Atlas - 3.8.2 - New Portfile

[MacPorts]

#18173: Atlas - 3.8.2 - New Portfile
------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
 Reporter:  krunk7@…          |       Owner:  ajb78@…          
     Type:  enhancement       |      Status:  new              
 Priority:  Normal            |   Milestone:  Port Bugs        
Component:  ports             |     Version:  1.7.0            
 Keywords:                    |        Port:  atlas            
------------------------------+---------------------------------------------

Comment(by blb@…):

 During a build:
 {{{
 rm -f ATL_tMpFiLe
 /mp/var/macports/build/_Users_blb_devel_macports_trunk_dports_math_atlas/work/atlas-3.8.2/build/bin/xsubstr
 -o ATL_tMpFiLe -i
 /mp/var/macports/build/_Users_blb_devel_macports_trunk_dports_math_atlas/work/atlas-3.8.2/build/..//tune/blas/gemm/CASES/zcases.flg
 \
            -s '^gcc' 'gcc -fPIC -force_cpusubtype_ALL -m32' -s ' gcc' '
 gcc -fPIC -force_cpusubtype_ALL -m32'
 ./xuserflag -i ATL_tMpFiLe -o zcases.flg
 cc1: error: invalid option 'cpu=ultrasparc'
 FlagCheck.c:1: error: bad value (ultrasparc) for -mtune= switch
 cc1: error: invalid option 'altivec'
 cc1: error: invalid option 'abi=altivec'
 cc1: error: invalid option 'cpu=ultrasparc'
 cc1: error: invalid option 'cpu=ultrasparc'
 cc1: error: invalid option 'cpu=ultrasparc'
 cc1: error: invalid option 'cpu=970'
 cc1: error: invalid option 'ips4'
 cc1: error: invalid option 'ips4'
 cc1: error: invalid option 'ips4'
 cc1: error: invalid option 'ips4'
 gcc -fPIC -force_cpusubtype_ALL -m32  -mcpu=ultrasparc -mtune=ultrasparc
 -fomit-frame-pointer -O -fno-schedule-insns -fno-schedule-insns2  -c
 -DATL_BETA=1 FlagCheck.c
 }}}
 but it doesn't fail; is that expected?  I see several other
 -mcpu=ultrasparc options elsewhere as well...

 Also, just a curious bit of output:
 {{{
 BEST: ATL_ger1_8x4_0.c, mu=8, nu=4; at -2156.77 MFLOPS
 }}}
 negative MFLOPS...there was at least one other instance of negative
 MFLOPS.  I'm guessing these are just parts of its testing procedure, since
 it otherwise appears to finish building?

 Finally, can the commented-out destroot bits be removed since it appears
 to install those anyway?

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.macports.org/ticket/18173#comment:2>
MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/>
Ports system for Mac OS