[MacPorts] #20103: Use a common default variant for a recent gcc port in scientific packages
MacPorts
noreply at macports.org
Sat Jul 4 06:46:32 PDT 2009
#20103: Use a common default variant for a recent gcc port in scientific packages
-----------------------------------+----------------------------------------
Reporter: alakazam@… | Owner: macports-tickets@…
Type: update | Status: new
Priority: Normal | Milestone:
Component: ports | Version: 1.7.1
Keywords: | Port: octave arpack
-----------------------------------+----------------------------------------
Comment(by takeshi@…):
Replying to [comment:6 takeshi@…]:
> OK. I will make gcc43 the default variant and make g95 a variant, where
possible.
I tried to use gcc43 (gfortran) as suggested but not completely
successful.
We do need g95 :-).
> I need to update gcc42 to gcc43 fo adaptor.
> Better to rename gfortran to gcc43 in hdf4.
Done.
> I have to swap roles between gcc43 and g95 for fgsl.
Not successful since gfortran does not support complex(c_double).
> I need to add gcc43 variant for udunits.
udunits does not seem to require a fortran compiler at build time.
gfortran does not work since it seem to have a problem with preprocessor
(-traditional-cpp).
> Here is an exception: vis5d+ fails to build with gcc43.
I left as it is.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.macports.org/ticket/20103#comment:8>
MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/>
Ports system for Mac OS
More information about the macports-tickets
mailing list